Silent Hill:Downpour. SH IS BACK!

This part is one of the best! Atmosphere, music, plot… It is perhaps inferior only to parts 2 and 4. That’s all. I was very surprised by the ratings from the gaming press. If foreign ones gave high marks (except for IGN), then our publications… that SG and PG they “lowered” the rating. Why remains a mystery to me. And the funny thing is that SG and PG could only bring combat and graphics out of the minuses. They at least played CX? The combat in all parts is not AI (yes, the combat in Homecoming is also clumsy). Why did they bother with this?? Jaya defends “Alan Wake” was given more… But the opinion of “Gaming Mania” surprised me, her assessment of Silent Hill: Downpour 8.0 points.

Best comments

Well first of all:
Review contains opinion author review itself, and since there is no general opinion, then there will be dissatisfied and satisfied.
Secondly:
If in other games in the series the combat system is not finalized, then this can serve as an excuse for the game?

Yes, he said everything correctly. https://777tigerscasino.co.uk/games/ First, you need to say objectively that the combat is terrible – you constantly don’t hit, it’s not blocked in time, etc. And then add that maybe it was done in such a way as to add atmosphere and it all depends on the player. And people will decide for themselves.

There is no objective opinion in nature. And even if you try to aggregate the opinions of a large number of people, you still won’t get something objective in the end.

Well, look. The combat in the game is poor, that’s objective. But many will say that this was done specifically for the atmosphere and will consider that this is objective, because in some ways they are right.
Well, here’s how to come to something concrete?

If it is completely subjective then there will be no point in reading it. Many people read reviews, for example, in order to understand whether to buy this game or not. If the author hates it fiercely or hates the series of this game, then of course the bias of the review will be in the negative direction. Reviews should be written without relying on your own preferences. But there is a game and we need to tell about it as it really is

In some cases, you can take some standard of the game genre. I don’t understand how it can be made poorly for the atmosphere, it’s still subjective, but the fact that it’s crooked there, when you hit the enemy point-blank and don’t hit.T.d. this is objective